Many have asked me questions about how the French legal system actually works, and have reacted in many cases very strongly to the fact that SOS Racism and LICRA were there as third parties able to argue in favour of my conviction and able ask the judge for economic compensation directly to them from me, if I am found guilty.
This apparently sounds completely absurd to some, and is difficult to understand, but Frenchmen I have spoken to have explained to me that these organisations work that way, and are allowed to work that way, to ensure that everybody who oppose them and their agenda will not only be destroyed financially, but also be forced to finance their organisations. The ‘racism’ of Frenchmen (or others they get the opportunity to sue) has thus according to the Frenchmen I have spoken to become a source of income to them, and they use this for all it is worth.
Nobody in France (or elsewhere for that sake) filed a complaint against the Thulean Perspective blog, and the case against me was started solely on the initiative of politicians in Paris, and came after and as a result of their illegal arrest of my wife and me in July last year. When LICRA and SOS Racism heard of this, they jumped on the opportunity to go to court and ask for compensation from me, for according to them having sabotagued their effort to race mix the French people.
Yes, you probably didn’t misunderstand anything of what I said above: the lawyer representing LICRA (“International League against Racism and Antisemitism”) said in court the 3rd of June, as I and others present there too understood it, that the organisation he represents is working to completely race mix the French population, something they aim to have achieved in 50 years from now, and my work, with my according to him ‘very effective weapon’, the Thulean Perspective blog, had made this work so much more difficult for them. He also argued that I made money from spreading ‘racism’ with my blog (although in reality I have a dramatically lower income now compared to what I had before I started the blog, something the court knows). According to him, because of me they had to spend more money and more time to achieve their goal. Ergo I had to pay them 5000 EUROs, as some sort compensation…. and another 5000 EUROs to SOS Racism, in addition to the 5000 EUROs the prosecutor argued that I should pay to the French state, as part of the punishment – if found guilty.
I will not discuss why organisations whose common agenda is as I understand it to expose the French people to what International law define as genocide (see in particular c below, but also b and d) are allowed to even exist (in France itself!). Nor will I discuss why there seems to be a consensus that their work is legitimate. Nor will I discuss who are behind these organisations, but I encourage you to investagate the matter yourself.
According to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II, genocide is:
…any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
- (a) Killing members of the group;
- (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
- (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
- (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
- (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
As explained here, the evidence used against me is made up of print screens, but I can add that the evidence is also made up of some other fabricated evidence, where real posts from Thulean Persepctive have been modified by ‘anonymous’ individuals, and have then been presented as real TP posts to the prosecutor (and presented in court as print-screens…).
Cui bono?
Related post here.
