First of all I wish to thank everybody who supported me in this case, both those who donated so that I could afford the process and those who were there themselves, physically or in spirit.
As some of you know the interior ministry in France wanted to expel me from France, obviously to cover up the crimes they had already committed against my family; throwing us out would make it very difficult for us to enable the justice system in France to uncover these crimes. Although I don’t think the political system in France seems to work very well, just like in most other European countries I may add (nothing special about France in that context), the justice system in France seems to work just fine. At least for now (…), and I guess in spite of the decay that seems to come from the political leadership. (“Fish rots from the head”.)
It should come to no surprise to you that the commission in Brive la Gaillarde judged in my favour. All those present that day probably already knew that this would be the result. I can also add that they came to this conclusion, without any delay, the same day we were there; the 10th of September. Unlike what the press said there was nothing suggesting that I should be expelled, so why linger?
About my criminal past they say: “it is a continuing fact that Mr. Kristian VIKERNES has never been convicted for anything at all in France”. I have been here since February 2010, so if I was a criminal I am sure France would know by now. (Original text: “il est constant que Monsieur Kristian VIKERNES n’a fait l’objet d’aucune condamnation pénale en France”.)
About my work to promote pre-Christian European ideals, and interior ministery’s attempt to label this as “neo-Nazism”, “racism” and “anti-Semitism” they say that: “Considering that even though he acknowledge that he express himself on a blog with a purpose of promoting European pre-Christian culture he denies the racist and neo-Nazi nature of these expressions, in the sense that he says that the expressions [used by the interior ministery as evidence] are unreliable translations not done by him and that they are taken out of context”. (Original text: “Considérant que s’il l’intéressé reconnaît tenir des propos sur un blog visant à promouvoir la culture européenne pré-chrétienne, il conteste le caractère racial et néo-nazi des propos estimant que la traduction proposée n’est pas fiable et qu’il ne s’agit que d’extraits, non inscrits dans leur contexte.”
About my “survivalism” they say that: “this way of life is not a threat and does not come into conflict with the social order”. (Original text: “ce mode de vie n’est pas en soi constitutif d’une infraction, ni d’une attitude menaçante pour l’ordre social”.)
Their conclusion is: “All the above taken into account the suggested expulsion decision is in no way necessary for the security of the state or for public safety, and that no elements in this case are characteristic for a factual, actual and sufficiently serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society.” (Original text: “Considérant qu’il résulte de l’ensemble de ce qui précède que la mesure d’expulsion projetée ne répond à aucune nécessité impérieuse pour la sûcreté de ‘Etat ou la sécuritè publique et qu’aucun élément du dossier ne caractérise un comportement personnel représentant une menace réelle, actuelle et suffisamment grave pour un intérêt fondamental de la société.”)
“Based on the above mentioned the commission advices against an expulsion of Mr. Kristian VIKERNES.” (Original text: “Considérant que par suite, la commission émet un avis défavorable à l’expulsion de Monsieur Kristian VIKERNES.”)
This might still not stop Mr. Valls from expelling me, but it will pretty much ensure that if I appeal to the justice system (and of course I will) they will annul his decision and allow me to return. There is no reason whatsoever to expel me, and now the justice system in France has said the same. HailaR Furasitan! HailaR WôðanaR!
PS. Because my so-called criminal past comes to the surface again and again, I will add that the political system in Norway is rotten to the core, just like the political system in all other European nations, but unlike in France the justice system too in Norway is rotten to the core. Eastern Europeans who come to Norway and come into conflict with the law there all say the same. These Eastern Europeans are indeed professional criminals, and they tour Europe to rob us, but they told me that the justice system in Germany worked; the system actually needs proof to convict you there. They also told me that the justice system in France worked; the system actually needs proof to convict you there. The justice system in Norway on the other hand is just like the justice system of the Soviet Union; they convict you not because they have any proof, but because they think you are guilty. They want to convict you, so they do.
My own experience with the so-called “justice” system in Norway is very negative. In my case they made witnesses give false testimony against me and convicted me solely on that ground. There was no other evidence whatsoever! One single person claimed I had accompanied him in each and every arson case; and of course each and every one of these guys were friends of the person I had killed, and they were also promised (by KRIPOS, the “criminal police”) a more lenient punishment for themselves if they gave false testimony against me. In 1998 Bård G. Eithun even confirmed this in court, under oath. The other witnesses either refused to say anything at all or they simply failed to show up (and I assume this was the case because they had had the time to think over their pitiful acts by then). So there was no physical evidence and nobody gave testimony against me, and still I was convicted – again – and for the same crimes, to pay some 40 million NOK in compensation for the arsons, in addition to the 21 year prison term I had been given in 1994, when I was convicted the first time.
The “murder” case was no different of course, and my attempt to save my life became a “planned murder” executed in a “brutal fashion”. The fact that the guy I killed had plans to torture me to death was completely ignored (by the media too…). According to them I had no comprehensible motive for killing him, they claimed, and the media even made up stories about a “power struggle” in the Black Metal underground (that I by then was not even a part of…). Even if I had planned to kill him in Oslo that day, the fact that he planned to torture me to death should have been at least brought up as a possible motive, and certainly was a redeeming factor, but no; I had “no good reason whatsoever” to “brutally murder” that “poor” (self-proclaimed devil-worshiping) Øystein Aarseth.
A 21 year sentence in Norway meant that you had to serve 12 years in prison, and then you would automatically be released, with a 9 year prison term hanging over you in case you did something similar again. So in practise I was given a 12 year prison term to serve. Now, in 2001 they made a new law stating that if you were given a 21 year prison term to serve you would instead serve 14 years in prison, and amazingly they made this new law retroactive. This of course is in violation of not only the Norwegian constitution, but also international law. Now, they didn’t actually make it retroactive as a general rule; they only made it retroactive in relation to me. E. g. an Iraqi, who raped and murdered a Norwegian teenager in Oslo in 1992, who also served a 21 year prison term, was released after 12 years, in 2004, as he according to “Norwegian” law and justice should, but “of course” I was not. I – unlike all other criminals receiving such a term in Norway before 2001 – had to serve 14 years instead. So I was given another 2 years in prison only because they made a new law and then made it retroactive. When I had served these 14 years and asked to be released they – I am not kidding you – suddenly found out that I had not been prepared for a release…. I was not ready for freedom, they argued. The reason for this was that I had now (because of their crimes) spent so much time in prison… (wtf?!) So I spent another 2 years in prison being “prepared” for freedom (which in practise means absolutely nothing; you just continue to serve like you used to do). So, my 12 years turned into 16 years for no good reason whatsoever.
Naturally, in the meanwhile the Jew-press in Norway continued to spread lies, they continued their slander and their campaign to demonize me, but in the end even some of them started to question what the criminals ruling Norway did, and it was probably because some newspapers in Norway started to tell tiny bits of truth in this context that the department of justice (i. e. politicians in Oslo), after heated debates and only with a minimal support in my favour decided to release me in 2009. They did because they pretty much had to.
So why did all of this happen to me? Because I – when I was 19 years old (!) – spoke up against Freemasonry, Christiainty, Communism, Feminism, multiculturalism and other Jewish influence in Norway, and – perhaps more importantly – because I promoted real European culture; the pre-Christian European religion. You can today always argue that I was not the most knowledgeable or well-spoken individuals around, and that I was first of all very good at provoking them, but nevertheless; that was my real “crime”! I wanted a return to pre-Christian belief systems, and yes; to them – the real and artificial Jews – this is a huge threat, and in fact the biggest threat of all, because Ôðinn is in our blood, so to speak, and when showed to Europeans he can return before they can say the word “cake”, and if he does all their work falls into ruin, and Europe will prevail.
Ôðinn – the spirit of Europe – is like embers under the ashes, dreaming of becoming a flaming fire again, lighting up and warming the world; all you need to revive him is to add some dry twigs and some firewood.
